Автор:
cassyan
Дата: 06.07.2016 01:52
Re: 7-й Украинский топик
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от Проходящий
>>>
|
Спасибо! Я с английским не особо в хороших отношениях. Но насколько я понял, единственный абзац, содержащий упоминание Киева и Харькова в этом тексте - вот он:
Цитата:
If Ukraine has to be supported so that it does resist, the Ukrainians have to know the West is prepared to help them resist. And there’s no reason to be secretive about it. It would be much better to be open about it and to say to the Ukrainians and to those who may threaten Ukraine that if Ukrainians resist, they will have weapons. And we’ll provide some of those weapons in advance of the very act of invasion. Because in the absence of that, the temptation to invade and to preempt may become overwhelming. But what kind of weapons is important. And in my view, they should be weapons designed particularly to permit the Ukrainians to engage in effective urban warfare of resistance. There’s no point trying to arm the Ukrainians to take on the Russian army in the open field. Thousands of tanks, an army organized for the application of overwhelming force. There is a history to be learned here from urban resistance in World War II and most recently in Chechnya, whose capital persisted for three months in house-to-house fighting. The point is, if the effort to invade was to be successful politically, it would have to incorporate taking the major cities. If the major cities, say Kharkiv, say Kiev, were to resist and street fighting became a necessity, it would be prolonged and costly. And the fact of the matter is, and this is where the timing of this whole crisis is important, Russia is not yet ready to undertake that kind of an effort. It will be too costly in blood, paralyzingly costly in finances. And would take a long time and create more and more international pressure.
|
Прошу Командира простить меня за большую цитату. Так вот, возможно я криво прочитал, но вкратце речь о том, что Украине нужно дать оборонительное оружие, дабы захват крупных городов вроде Киева или Харькова стал для России очень трудным и невыносимо дорогим. Разрушать города он всё-таки не предлагает. А вообще речь довольно любопытная, насколько мы с Гуглем смогли её понять, но относится к 2014 году. А сейчас времена уже другие.
|